|
Sprinkler Systems
Uhaul move
Lawn care
Roses and trees
Ford Parts
Chrysler Parts
Lake Powell
New IPod Touch Apps
New IPhone Apps
IPhone Apps
IPad Information
IPad Apps
Android APPS
Android Games APPS
Android Systems
Android Tablets APPS and Beyond
Smartphone Apps
Smartphone Games Apps Repair and Tools
Tablet PC
Car Sharing Car Leasing
Tabler Pc
Fly Fishing
Toyota Cars
Vacation Rentals
Stock market
NYSE
SSE Stock
Freight & Shipping News
Gluten
Lactose
Gout
My Coupon Life
Campgrounds Check
Outdoor
Kitchen Design and Redoo
Bath Remodeling
Palm Springs
Las Vegas Vacation Tipps
Lake Powell Boating
Homes for lease
Electric and green Car Blog
Pearls and diamonds
Whatsapp and forget SMS Blog, What is Whatsapp App
Solar Panel Solar Energie Sun Power Blog
|
Fantasy » alt.fan.pratchett » [I] Naughty Corner
| [I] Naughty Corner [message #276185] |
Fr, 02 Juni 2006 08:19 |
|
I swore I'd never do this, but I'm finding it ironic that we currently
have a thread called teaching children to behave when a lot of people
are currently behaving like them. I am officially avoiding the other
thread until further notice because I like and respect *everyone*
currently involved in it.
I understand that people may take offense at this but you are in the
naughty corner until you learn to play nice.
naomi
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Naughty Corner [message #276186 ] |
Fr, 02 Juni 2006 08:23 |
|
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, naomi wrote:
> I understand that people may take offense at this but you are in the naughty
> corner until you learn to play nice.
>
Does that mean I can be naughty with the other people here 'til I learn?
(sorry miss, couldn't help it!)
--
flippa [at] flippac.org
'In Ankh-Morpork even the shit have a street to itself...
Truly this is a land of opportunity.' - Detritus, Men at Arms
|
|
|
| Re: Naughty Corner [message #276197 ] |
Fr, 02 Juni 2006 08:50 |
|
naomi wrote:
> I swore I'd never do this, but I'm finding it ironic that we currently
> have a thread called teaching children to behave when a lot of people
> are currently behaving like them. I am officially avoiding the other
> thread until further notice because I like and respect *everyone*
> currently involved in it.
>
> I understand that people may take offense at this but you are in the
> naughty corner until you learn to play nice.
>
> naomi
Has anyone ever considered a thread for arguments? any thread where an
argument develops, the arguers could be directed to a thread devoted to
letting people argue all they want about the most inane issues.
This way, people wouldn't be forced to sift through it all to find more
on-topic, casual discussions. Just an idea.
treesy
|
|
|
| Re: [M] Naughty Corner [message #276232 ] |
Fr, 02 Juni 2006 10:56 |
|
treesy wrote:
>
> Has anyone ever considered a thread for arguments? any thread where an
> argument develops, the arguers could be directed to a thread devoted
> to letting people argue all they want about the most inane issues.
Well, yes, it's a nice thought, and it works in some places. But those
places tends to be moderated.
It's kind of interesting, in an ironic way, that a discussion about how
some topics become invasive and take over all threads became invasive
and took over all threads.
You gotta laugh, to (possibly mis-)quote Ly Tin Weedle.
Anyway, welcome to the group. We're not usually this cranky, and most
of us find enough gems to find it worthwhile to stick around. I hope
you do, too.
Orjan
--
The Tale of Westala and Villtin
http://tale.cunobaros.com/
Fiction, Thoughts and Software
http://www.cunobaros.com/
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Naughty Corner [message #276281 ] |
Fr, 02 Juni 2006 13:22 |
|
treesy wrote:
(snip)
I don't think I remembered to welcome you to the group, so...
Welcome to afp:-) We're not like that *other* thread most of the time
- there's a lot of general good-natured interesting stuff to be found
on different threads.
CCA
|
|
|
| [I] Argument Thread (was Re: Naughty Corner) [message #276329 ] |
Fr, 02 Juni 2006 14:58 |
|
The time: 02 Jun 2006. The place: alt.fan.pratchett. The
speaker: "treesy" <treesy2 [at] hotmail.com>
>
> naomi wrote:
>> I swore I'd never do this, but I'm finding it ironic that
>> we currently have a thread called teaching children to
>> behave when a lot of people are currently behaving like
>> them. I am officially avoiding the other thread until
>> further notice because I like and respect *everyone*
>> currently involved in it.
>>
>> I understand that people may take offense at this but you
>> are in the naughty corner until you learn to play nice.
>>
>> naomi
>
> Has anyone ever considered a thread for arguments? any
> thread where an argument develops, the arguers could be
> directed to a thread devoted to letting people argue all
> they want about the most inane issues.
>
> This way, people wouldn't be forced to sift through it all
> to find more on-topic, casual discussions. Just an idea.
Welcome to the Argument Thread. Do you want to have just one
argument, or were you thinking of taking a course?
<20p>
--
Dave
Official Absentee of EU Skiffeysoc
http://www.eusa.ed.ac.uk/societies/sesoc
Suggs against sexism. It's Madness gone
politically correct.
Jon Holmes, The Now Show 26/5/06
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Naughty Corner [message #276336 ] |
Fr, 02 Juni 2006 15:22 |
|
naomi wrote:
> I swore I'd never do this, but I'm finding it ironic that we currently
> have a thread called teaching children to behave when a lot of people
> are currently behaving like them.
>
I'm curious: would that thread be the reason why, having been away for
two days, I now have 700 unread messages in a.f.p?
Michael
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Naughty Corner [message #276343 ] |
Fr, 02 Juni 2006 15:39 |
|
Michael J. Schülke wrote:
> naomi wrote:
>> I swore I'd never do this, but I'm finding it ironic that we
>> currently have a thread called teaching children to behave when a
>> lot of people are currently behaving like them.
>>
> I'm curious: would that thread be the reason why, having been away for
> two days, I now have 700 unread messages in a.f.p?
>
> Michael
It's a cunning plan to reduce the gutter/child-safe ratio!
--
Ed.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Naughty Corner [message #276380 ] |
Fr, 02 Juni 2006 16:42 |
|
Ed Weatherup wrote:
> Michael J. Schülke wrote:
>>naomi wrote:
>>
>>>I swore I'd never do this, but I'm finding it ironic that we
>>>currently have a thread called teaching children to behave when a
>>>lot of people are currently behaving like them.
>>
>>I'm curious: would that thread be the reason why, having been away for
>>two days, I now have 700 unread messages in a.f.p?
>
> It's a cunning plan to reduce the gutter/child-safe ratio!
Which tragically backfired when the child-safe debate thread started
containing worked examples.
|
|
|
| Re: Naughty Corner [message #276902 ] |
Fr, 02 Juni 2006 21:01 |
|
treesy wrote:
<snip>
> Has anyone ever considered a thread for arguments? any thread where an
> argument develops, the arguers could be directed to a thread devoted
> to letting people argue all they want about the most inane issues.
"Is this the right thread for an argument?"
Diane L.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Naughty Corner [message #276968 ] |
Fr, 02 Juni 2006 22:35 |
|
Michael J. Schülke <news0605 [at] mjschuelke.de> wrote:
> naomi wrote:
>> I swore I'd never do this, but I'm finding it ironic that we
>> currently have a thread called teaching children to behave when a
>> lot of people are currently behaving like them.
>>
> I'm curious: would that thread be the reason why, having been away for
> two days, I now have 700 unread messages in a.f.p?
No, that's just a small part. In most of those messages we were actually
discussing you.
Regards,
--
*Art
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Naughty Corner [message #276990 ] |
Fr, 02 Juni 2006 23:10 |
|
Arthur Hagen wrote:
> No, that's just a small part. In most of those messages we were actually
> discussing you.
>
Thanks, that's comforting to know.
Michael
|
|
|
| Re: Naughty Corner [message #277075 ] |
Sa, 03 Juni 2006 02:11 |
|
Michael J. Sch=FClke wrote:
> naomi wrote:
> > I swore I'd never do this, but I'm finding it ironic that we currently
> > have a thread called teaching children to behave when a lot of people
> > are currently behaving like them.
> >
> I'm curious: would that thread be the reason why, having been away for
> two days, I now have 700 unread messages in a.f.p?
>=20
> Michael
That would be my first thread....
treesy.
|
|
|
| Re: Naughty Corner [message #277100 ] |
Sa, 03 Juni 2006 02:45 |
|
treesy wrote:
>
> That would be my first thread....
>
Congratulations :-)
I suppose somebody else has already supplied you with cat, alligator,
chair, chocolate, etc.?
Michael
|
|
|
| Re: Naughty Corner [message #277161 ] |
Sa, 03 Juni 2006 08:49 |
|
"Diane L" <dianenews [at] lindquist.plus.com> wrote in message
news:4ebg8fF1e0bdlU1 [at] individual.net...
> treesy wrote:
>
> <snip>
> > Has anyone ever considered a thread for arguments? any thread where an
> > argument develops, the arguers could be directed to a thread devoted
> > to letting people argue all they want about the most inane issues.
>
> "Is this the right thread for an argument?"
>
> Diane L.
>
No, I am sorry, this is getting hit on the head lessons...no, wait, that is
that thread up there, isn't it... ;)
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Naughty Corner [message #277171 ] |
Sa, 03 Juni 2006 09:33 |
|
Michael J. Schülke <news0605 [at] mjschuelke.de> wrote:
> treesy wrote:
> >
> > That would be my first thread....
> >
> Congratulations :-)
>
> I suppose somebody else has already supplied you with cat, alligator,
> chair, chocolate, etc.?
Yep. The cat jumped on his lap, he fell off the chair,
splashed into the chocolate, and got eaten by the
alligator.
Someone bring in the next newbie, please.
Schobi
P.S.: Hey, I remembered looking at the subject and even
noticed the missing tag! What prize do I get?
--
SpamTrap [at] gmx.de is never read
I'm Schobi at suespammers dot org
"The sarcasm is mightier than the sword."
Eric Jarvis
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Naughty Corner [message #277179 ] |
Sa, 03 Juni 2006 10:48 |
|
In article <44813c25$1$4495$9b4e6d93 [at] newsread2.arcor-online.net>,
Hendrik Schober <really_long_address [at] gmx.net> wrote:
>Michael J. Schülke <news0605 [at] mjschuelke.de> wrote:
<snip>
>> I suppose somebody else has already supplied you with cat, alligator,
>> chair, chocolate, etc.?
>
> Yep. The cat jumped on his lap, he fell off the chair,
> splashed into the chocolate, and got eaten by the
> alligator.
> Someone bring in the next newbie, please.
>
> P.S.: Hey, I remembered looking at the subject and even
> noticed the missing tag! What prize do I get?
You can have the leftover chocolate.
=Tamar
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Naughty Corner [message #277204 ] |
Sa, 03 Juni 2006 11:36 |
|
On 2 Jun, Diane L wrote:
[snip]
> "Is this the right thread for an argument?"
>
I told you once...
--
Brian Howlett - Email to From: address deleted unseen
------------------------------------------------------------ ---
I came home from work the other day and found that someone had
stolen all my furniture, and replaced it with exact replicas...
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Naughty Corner [message #277221 ] |
Sa, 03 Juni 2006 12:16 |
|
Richard Eney wrote:
> In article <44813c25$1$4495$9b4e6d93 [at] newsread2.arcor-online.net>,
> Hendrik Schober <really_long_address [at] gmx.net> wrote:
>> Michael J. Schülke <news0605 [at] mjschuelke.de> wrote:
> <snip>
>>> I suppose somebody else has already supplied you with cat, alligator,
>>> chair, chocolate, etc.?
>> Yep. The cat jumped on his lap, he fell off the chair,
>> splashed into the chocolate, and got eaten by the
>> alligator.
>> Someone bring in the next newbie, please.
>>
>> P.S.: Hey, I remembered looking at the subject and even
>> noticed the missing tag! What prize do I get?
>
> You can have the leftover chocolate.
>
<shock>LEFTOVER??</shock>
An oxymoron when AFP is concerned.
But, here, have a kitten. Or two. or as many as you want!
Pudde.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Naughty Corner [message #277223 ] |
Sa, 03 Juni 2006 12:13 |
|
Richard Eney <dicconf [at] radix.net> wrote:
> In article <44813c25$1$4495$9b4e6d93 [at] newsread2.arcor-online.net>,
> Hendrik Schober <really_long_address [at] gmx.net> wrote:
> > Michael J. Schülke <news0605 [at] mjschuelke.de> wrote:
> <snip>
> > > I suppose somebody else has already supplied you with cat, alligator,
> > > chair, chocolate, etc.?
> >
> > Yep. The cat jumped on his lap, he fell off the chair,
> > splashed into the chocolate, and got eaten by the
> > alligator.
> > Someone bring in the next newbie, please.
> >
> > P.S.: Hey, I remembered looking at the subject and even
> > noticed the missing tag! What prize do I get?
>
> You can have the leftover chocolate.
I'm not really overly fond of chocolate.
I'd try to give alligator stew a try, if that's all
the same to you...
Schobi
--
SpamTrap [at] gmx.de is never read
I'm Schobi at suespammers dot org
"The sarcasm is mightier than the sword."
Eric Jarvis
|
|
|
| Re: Naughty Corner [message #277232 ] |
Sa, 03 Juni 2006 12:32 |
|
treesy wrote:
> Michael J. Schülke wrote:
>> I'm curious: would that thread be the reason why, having been away
>> for two days, I now have 700 unread messages in a.f.p?
>>
>> Michael
>
> That would be my first thread....
Try not to take it personally. Your post didn't cause the monster thread,
it was just the scene of the crime. :-)
Diane L.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Naughty Corner [message #277251 ] |
Sa, 03 Juni 2006 13:20 |
|
On Fri, 02 Jun 2006 06:19:49 GMT, naomi <kittenkat [at] dodo.com.au> wrote:
>I understand that people may take offense at this but you are in the
>naughty corner until you learn to play nice.
Wait, there's a nice corner?
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Naughty Corner [message #277264 ] |
Sa, 03 Juni 2006 13:45 |
|
Pudde Fjord puddespamfjord [at] netscape.net wrote in
<448160fc$1 [at] news.broadpark.no>:
> Richard Eney wrote:
> > In article <44813c25$1$4495$9b4e6d93 [at] newsread2.arcor-online.net>,
> > Hendrik Schober <really_long_address [at] gmx.net> wrote:
> >> Michael J. Schülke <news0605 [at] mjschuelke.de> wrote:
> > <snip>
> >>> I suppose somebody else has already supplied you with cat, alligator,
> >>> chair, chocolate, etc.?
> >> Yep. The cat jumped on his lap, he fell off the chair,
> >> splashed into the chocolate, and got eaten by the
> >> alligator.
> >> Someone bring in the next newbie, please.
> >>
> >> P.S.: Hey, I remembered looking at the subject and even
> >> noticed the missing tag! What prize do I get?
> >
> > You can have the leftover chocolate.
> >
> <shock>LEFTOVER??</shock>
>
> An oxymoron when AFP is concerned.
>
It has been known to happen. You have to start with an awful lot of
chocolate and not all that many afpers, but it has been done.
--
eric
www.ericjarvis.co.uk
"live fast, die only if strictly necessary"
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Naughty Corner [message #277269 ] |
Sa, 03 Juni 2006 14:45 |
|
"Hendrik Schober" <SpamTrap [at] gmx.de> wrote:
> Richard Eney <dicconf [at] radix.net> wrote:
> > In article <44813c25$1$4495$9b4e6d93 [at] newsread2.arcor-online.net>,
> > Hendrik Schober <really_long_address [at] gmx.net> wrote:
> > > P.S.: Hey, I remembered looking at the subject and even
> > > noticed the missing tag! What prize do I get?
> >
> > You can have the leftover chocolate.
>
> I'm not really overly fond of chocolate.
You can have the leftover English chocolate, then.
Richard
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Naughty Corner [message #277278 ] |
Sa, 03 Juni 2006 14:58 |
|
Eric Jarvis wrote:
> Pudde Fjord puddespamfjord [at] netscape.net wrote in
> <448160fc$1 [at] news.broadpark.no>:
>> <shock>LEFTOVER??</shock>
>>
>> An oxymoron when AFP is concerned.
>>
>
> It has been known to happen. You have to start with an awful lot of
> chocolate and not all that many afpers, but it has been done.
>
There was a cloggie gathering a couple of months ago, where a uk afper
brought about 60UKP worth of green and black's chocolate bars over...
At the end of the weekend we still had a massive amount of leftover
chocolate [1], and I took about 10 bars home with me...
And when I got home I found out our host sneakily added an extra 5 bars
of chocolates into my bags.
tamara,
who has loads of chocolate for any occasion
[1] even after using some of it for a chocolate fountain, and boy -
those things are chocolate guzzlers!
--
tamara at blue-infinity dot net
--
To practice Zen and the art of Jewish motorcycle maintenance, do the
following:
Get rid of the motorcycle. What /were/ you thinking?
-- David M. Bader, Zen Judaism
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Naughty Corner [message #277293 ] |
Sa, 03 Juni 2006 17:37 |
|
Richard Bos wrote:
> "Hendrik Schober" <SpamTrap [at] gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> Richard Eney <dicconf [at] radix.net> wrote:
>>> In article <44813c25$1$4495$9b4e6d93 [at] newsread2.arcor-online.net>,
>>> Hendrik Schober <really_long_address [at] gmx.net> wrote:
>>>> P.S.: Hey, I remembered looking at the subject and even
>>>> noticed the missing tag! What prize do I get?
>>> You can have the leftover chocolate.
>> I'm not really overly fond of chocolate.
>
> You can have the leftover English chocolate, then.
>
BZZZZZ! Contradiction-in-terms alert!
--
Regards
Nigel Stapley
www.judgemental.plus.com
<reply-to will bounce>
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Naughty Corner [message #277305 ] |
Sa, 03 Juni 2006 18:13 |
|
On 2006-06-03 04:36:03 -0500, Brian Howlett
<news-spamtrap [at] brianhowlett.me.uk> said:
> On 2 Jun, Diane L wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> "Is this the right thread for an argument?"
>>
> I told you once...
No you didn't.
--
If there is one thing i can do, it's multitask.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Naughty Corner [message #277306 ] |
Sa, 03 Juni 2006 18:14 |
|
On 2006-06-03 05:16:57 -0500, Pudde Fjord <puddespamfjord [at] netscape.net> said:
> But, here, have a kitten. Or two. or as many as you want!
Ah, alligator bait. How very kind of you.
--
My computer is so fast it can execute an infinite loop in 3 seconds.
|
|
|
| Re: [C] Argument (was) Naughty Corner [message #277309 ] |
Sa, 03 Juni 2006 18:18 |
|
On 3 Jun, René wrote:
> On 2006-06-03 04:36:03 -0500, Brian Howlett
> <news-spamtrap [at] brianhowlett.me.uk> said:
>
>> On 2 Jun, Diane L wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> "Is this the right thread for an argument?"
>>>
>> I told you once...
>
> No you didn't.
>
Yes I did!
--
Brian Howlett - Email to From: address deleted unseen
------------------------------------------------------------ ----------
Windows has detected that the mouse has been moved.
You must restart Windows for the new setting to take effect...
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Naughty Corner [message #277310 ] |
Sa, 03 Juni 2006 18:21 |
|
Eric Jarvis wrote:
> Pudde Fjord puddespamfjord [at] netscape.net wrote
> > Richard Eney wrote:
> > > You can have the leftover chocolate.
> > <shock>LEFTOVER??</shock>
> >
> > An oxymoron when AFP is concerned.
> It has been known to happen. You have to start with an awful lot of
> chocolate and not all that many afpers, but it has been done.
It happened at the first meet I went to. I brought along about three
bars of Green and Blacks and a few bags of Chocolate-Covered Coffee
Beans. Not all of these got eaten, so to avoid the leftovers being
cleared away and dumped by the staff of the pub, I took the rest home.
I'm not sure what everyone else did with their leftover chocolate, if
there was any.
CCDE 2003 saw a couple of bars of leftover chocolate too, mainly
because it had melted in the sun. ISTR Liz Ashton putting it to a
memorable use, of which I'm sure there are photos somewhere!
CCA
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Naughty Corner [message #277321 ] |
Sa, 03 Juni 2006 18:42 |
|
geminii [at] tpg.com.au wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jun 2006 06:19:49 GMT, naomi <kittenkat [at] dodo.com.au> wrote:
>
>
>>I understand that people may take offense at this but you are in the
>>naughty corner until you learn to play nice.
>
>
> Wait, there's a nice corner?
We had one once, but it's all overgrown. Cobwebs and things.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Naughty Corner [message #277345 ] |
Sa, 03 Juni 2006 19:21 |
|
geminii [at] tpg.com.au wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jun 2006 06:19:49 GMT, naomi <kittenkat [at] dodo.com.au> wrote:
>
>
>>I understand that people may take offense at this but you are in the
>>naughty corner until you learn to play nice.
>
>
> Wait, there's a nice corner?
If AFP?
Surely you jest!
|
|
|
| Re: Naughty Corner [message #277351 ] |
Sa, 03 Juni 2006 19:25 |
|
treesy wrote:
> Michael J. Schülke wrote:
>> naomi wrote:
>>> I swore I'd never do this, but I'm finding it ironic that we
>>> currently have a thread called teaching children to behave when a
>>> lot of people are currently behaving like them.
>>>
>> I'm curious: would that thread be the reason why, having been away
>> for two days, I now have 700 unread messages in a.f.p?
>>
>> Michael
>
> That would be my first thread....
Which is a real achievement, considering some debutantes get ignored and go
away sad.
--
Anastasia, 4th swordswoman of the afpocalypse.
AFPMinister of Flexible Weapons, Bondage-happy predator,
Speaker-To-Students, AFPMistress to peachy ashie passion &
AFPDeliciousSnack to 8'FED "If you can't be a good example, you'll
just have to be a horrible warning." C. Aird, _His Burial Too_
|
|
|
| Re: [C] Argument (was) Naughty Corner [message #277352 ] |
Sa, 03 Juni 2006 19:28 |
|
Brian Howlett wrote:
> On 3 Jun, René wrote:
>
>> On 2006-06-03 04:36:03 -0500, Brian Howlett
>> <news-spamtrap [at] brianhowlett.me.uk> said:
>>
>>> On 2 Jun, Diane L wrote:
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>>> "Is this the right thread for an argument?"
>>>>
>>> I told you once...
>>
>> No you didn't.
>>
> Yes I did!
Piss off! I never said that!
--
Anastasia, 4th swordswoman of the afpocalypse.
AFPMinister of Flexible Weapons, Bondage-happy predator,
Speaker-To-Students, AFPMistress to peachy ashie passion &
AFPDeliciousSnack to 8'FED "If you can't be a good example, you'll
just have to be a horrible warning." C. Aird, _His Burial Too_
|
|
|
| Re: [C] Argument (was) Naughty Corner [message #277362 ] |
Sa, 03 Juni 2006 19:35 |
|
Brian Howlett <news-spamtrap [at] brianhowlett.me.uk> wrote:
> On 3 Jun, René wrote:
>
> > On 2006-06-03 04:36:03 -0500, Brian Howlett
> > <news-spamtrap [at] brianhowlett.me.uk> said:
> >
> >> On 2 Jun, Diane L wrote:
> >>
> >> [snip]
> >>
> >>> "Is this the right thread for an argument?"
> >>>
> >> I told you once...
> >
> > No you didn't.
> >
> Yes I did!
That's not an argument, that's just contradiction!
--
Carol
Some are born weird, some achieve weirdness, and others
feed giraffes to the ceiling.
- Richard Robinson on uk.rec.sheds.
|
|
|
| Re: [C] Argument (was) Naughty Corner [message #277367 ] |
Sa, 03 Juni 2006 19:36 |
|
On 2006-06-03 12:35:12 -0500, carol [at] wrhpv.com (Carol Hague) said:
> Brian Howlett <news-spamtrap [at] brianhowlett.me.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 3 Jun, René wrote:
>>
>>> On 2006-06-03 04:36:03 -0500, Brian Howlett
>>> <news-spamtrap [at] brianhowlett.me.uk> said:
>>>
>>>> On 2 Jun, Diane L wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [snip]
>>>>
>>>>> "Is this the right thread for an argument?"
>>>>>
>>>> I told you once...
>>>
>>> No you didn't.
>>>
>> Yes I did!
>
> That's not an argument, that's just contradiction!
No it isn't!
--
If there is one thing i can do, it's multitask.
|
|
|
| Re: [C] Argument (was) Naughty Corner [message #277371 ] |
Sa, 03 Juni 2006 19:36 |
|
On 3 Jun, Anastasia wrote:
> Brian Howlett wrote:
>> On 3 Jun, René wrote:
>>
>>> On 2006-06-03 04:36:03 -0500, Brian Howlett
>>> <news-spamtrap [at] brianhowlett.me.uk> said:
>>>
>>>> On 2 Jun, Diane L wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [snip]
>>>>
>>>>> "Is this the right thread for an argument?"
>>>>>
>>>> I told you once...
>>>
>>> No you didn't.
>>>
>> Yes I did!
>
> Piss off! I never said that!
>
OK. Now you're making up your own MP sketches...
http://www.positiveatheism.org/writ/python.htm
--
Brian Howlett - Email to From: address deleted unseen
------------------------------------------------------------ ------
This place would be a paradise tomorrow, if every department had a
supervisor with a sub-machine gun.
|
|
|
| Re: [C] Argument (was) Naughty Corner [message #277383 ] |
Sa, 03 Juni 2006 19:52 |
|
René wrote:
> On 2006-06-03 12:35:12 -0500, carol [at] wrhpv.com (Carol Hague) said:
>
>> Brian Howlett <news-spamtrap [at] brianhowlett.me.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3 Jun, René wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2006-06-03 04:36:03 -0500, Brian Howlett
>>>> <news-spamtrap [at] brianhowlett.me.uk> said:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2 Jun, Diane L wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Is this the right thread for an argument?"
>>>>>>
>>>>> I told you once...
>>>>
>>>> No you didn't.
>>>>
>>> Yes I did!
>>
>> That's not an argument, that's just contradiction!
>
> No it isn't!
Yes it is!
--
Ed.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Naughty Corner [message #277455 ] |
Sa, 03 Juni 2006 22:18 |
|
geminii [at] tpg.com.au wrote:
> Wait, there's a nice corner?
No, but the gutter is fun!
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Naughty Corner [message #277465 ] |
Sa, 03 Juni 2006 22:18 |
|
Richard Bos <raltbos [at] xs4all.nl> wrote:
> "Hendrik Schober" <SpamTrap [at] gmx.de> wrote:
>
> > Richard Eney <dicconf [at] radix.net> wrote:
> > > In article <44813c25$1$4495$9b4e6d93 [at] newsread2.arcor-online.net>,
> > > Hendrik Schober <really_long_address [at] gmx.net> wrote:
> > > > P.S.: Hey, I remembered looking at the subject and even
> > > > noticed the missing tag! What prize do I get?
> > >
> > > You can have the leftover chocolate.
> >
> > I'm not really overly fond of chocolate.
>
> You can have the leftover English chocolate, then.
Thanks, I'd rather have Mongolian Sushi.
Schobi
--
SpamTrap [at] gmx.de is never read
I'm Schobi at suespammers dot org
"The sarcasm is mightier than the sword."
Eric Jarvis
|
|
|
Gehe zu:
aktuelle Zeit: Sa Mai 26 06:49:55 CEST 2012
Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0,13516 Sekunden |
